Coming—A Leaner and Meaner EU

Dominique Faget/AFP/Getty Images

Coming—A Leaner and Meaner EU

The next phase of the grand imperial Europe project calls for a refined order of EU governance and a more anti-Anglo-Saxon foreign policy.

The wraps are off. The whole project for the unification of Europe is finally seen in its true clothes as an imperialistic project of Romish German elites.

Built upon decades of lying, deceit and sleight of hand, the European Union has been carefully crafted from its beginnings as a simple treaty on shared access to coal and steel, through an ongoing succession of treaties over a 60-year period to the final implementation of an imperial constitution, as usual with a title masking its true nature, the Lisbon Treaty.

It is more than mere coincidence that what has been attained under this latest treaty embeds within the whole grand European conglomerate the achievement by subterfuge of the principle goals of that which Sir Winston Churchill called “Nazidom.”

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter wrote a very clear exposé of these achievements and the fascist methods by which European elites have attained them in the book they authored titled Treason at Maastricht. Together with Atkinson’s Fascist Europe Rising and Europe’s Full Circle, and Adrian Hilton’s The Principality and Power of Europe, this slim, easy-to-read treatise gives a concise picture as to how the Holy Roman Empire has been resurrected using treaties rather than military aggression, overlaid with the power of the Vatican, to achieve the goals that Hitler failed to realize.

For the past 20 years the Trumpet has worked to expose to the world the true nature of this rising beast. From Jan. 1, 2010, when Herman van Rompuy takes his seat as the first permanent head, the president, of the European Union, the project to unify Europe economically, monetarily, politically and militarily is a fait accompli.

So now that this grand imperial entity is finally exposed for that which it truly was always destined to be, the seventh and final resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire, what should we now look for as its next imperial projects?

Look for the EU to become leaner in its governmental structure, and a lot meaner in its foreign policy. This is simply guaranteed by inerrant Bible prophecy. Let us explain.

Students of Bible prophecy have known for a long time that the image of which King Nebuchadnezzar dreamed way back in 624 b.c. was in fact a pictograph of the succession of Gentile empires that have successively ruled the known world over the past 3,000 years. Our booklet Daniel Unlocks Revelation explains this in some detail.

The Daniel 2 image reveals the last and the longest-ruling empire to be an iron kingdom, split (the two legs) into eastern and western divisions. The matching prophecies of Revelation 13 and 17 reveal that this iron kingdom would have seven resurrections under the influence of an overarching spiritual power whose headquarters are in a city surrounded by seven hills. By comparing Revelation 13:1 with 17:12, we can readily see that the final resurrection of that empire will be divided into 10 governmental entities, all subservient to one chief ruler who will in turn be under the influence of the prophesied spiritual power. Adrian Hilton’s book gives some detail as to the history and the currency of that spiritual power in Europe.

Moves are now afoot to trim the unwieldy governmental structure of the European Union into a form that will allow for greater efficiency of administration. At present, the official EU map, which does not recognize national borders, shows its empire administratively structured into a staggering multitude of 1,671 regions.

The sheer complexity of centrally governing 27 nations, each possessing its own national language, culture and national character, is mind-boggling of itself, let alone juggling such a mind-numbing number of administrative regions. Add to this the overwhelming volume of regulations ensconced in the EU code of rules, the Acquis Communitaire, numbering 170,000 pages and translated into 23 languages, and it becomes obvious that, in its present form, the EU could literally end up an absolute confusion of European nations, rather than a workable union of such.

One solution to simplifying the governance of the 27-nation combine is to divide them ethnically. A recent report indicates that right-wing movements across Europe are providing “new impetus to the German strategy of restructuring Europe along ethnic lines” (, December 2).

That report further indicates that secessionists possess “a map with completely new European borders: Spain is divided into seven new countries, Germany has annexed Austria, parts of Switzerland and Northern Italy (South Tyrol). The territory of France is half its current size. According to the map … Bretagne, as well as the entire south of the country … have seceded. The map instigates diverse secessionist movements throughout Europe and is published in [the wake] of the Yugoslav wars of disintegration.” reports that the German Foreign Ministry is involved in supporting various institutions and movements that are agitating for the division of Europe along ethnic lines. “Since the beginning of the ’90s, the Federal Republic of Germany supported Yugoslavia’s disintegration along ethnic lines and favorably assisted the dissolution of Czechoslovakia. Various front organizations of Berlin’s foreign policy are supporting linguistic minorities in their struggles for special rights” (ibid.).

“The ethnic subdivision of Europe, as it is supported in Germany, lays the foundation not only for demands for autonomy but also for secessionist aspirations …. This ultimately weakens the nation-states competing with Germany for influence in Europe” (ibid.).

Whichever method is adopted to divide the EU into manageable regions of governance, one thing is certain. The end result will comprise 10 separate regions reporting to a singular supreme ruler. That Bible prophecy is as sure and as certain to be fulfilled as that declaring the resurrection of the seventh and final resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire now, which has suddenly become a current-day reality!

As to EU foreign policy, there will be a very good reason why the newly created position of high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy has been allowed by EU elites to fall to a flyweight incumbent as its first occupant.

It is possible that the more powerful position in EU foreign policy will be the new underling of the high representative. This will be the powerful position of head of the European External Action Service, the technocrat that coordinates the daily administration of the EU’s 130 legations, consulates and embassies slated to be operational by April 2010. That is a position which, not surprisingly, is powerfully coveted by Germany. Do not be in the least surprised to see a senior German technocrat appointed to that role. Either way, look for Germany to play the leading role in crafting EU foreign policy along a more overt globally interventionist path than has been the case to date.

A good part of that foreign policy will involve the EU stepping up to the plate to take on a higher profile role in the deployment of “peacekeeping” forces in a variety of theaters where the supply of raw materials is threatened, especially in Africa. Already Germany has agreed to extend its anti-piracy mission off Somalia and also extended its mandate for another year in Bosnia. But the burning question even now being addressed in Germany is the prospective change to Germany’s rules of engagement in theaters of combat. This debate was provoked by the Kunduz bombing in Afghanistan, and the subsequent declaration by Germany’s new defense minister, Baron Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, that German troops in Afghanistan were indeed involved in a war.

Watch for the outcome of the Kunduz debate to strengthen both the role and the image of the Bundeswehr as “peacekeepers” with a real mandate to engage the enemy in combat, endorsed by the German parliament for the first time since World War ii.

Especially watch for the profile of Guttenberg, the only really bright light in German politics today, to be enhanced by the outcome of the Kunduz affair, contrary to the beliefs of the liberal element in the German press.

As the new year advances and reality starts to dawn on America that it is fast losing its First World power status, watch for the EU to raise its anti-U.S. rhetoric and to increasingly go it alone with foreign-policy initiatives that leave America out in the cold, most especially with respect to Russia.

The year 2010 is set to reveal a European Union with an increasingly anti-Anglo-Saxon bent.

The prophecies that affirm the EU becoming both leaner and meaner in the very near future are expounded in our booklet Daniel Unlocks Revelation. Read that booklet—study it with an open mind attuned to the flow of current events. It’s a real eye-opener that will prepare your mind to adjust to the prophesied outcome of the great world events that are so turbulently building into the grand-smash climax at the end of this age.