theTrumpet.com
  • Gerald Flurry
  • Watch
    • Key of David TV Program
    • Trumpet Daily Program
    • Life and Teachings Program
    • Trumpet World Program
    • Trumpet Videos
  • Listen
  • Library
    • Books and Booklets
    • Trumpet Magazine
    • Bible Correspondence Course
    • Reprint Articles
    • Trumpet Brief E-mail Newsletter
    • Renew Trumpet Subscription
  • Sections
    • Anglo-America
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • Economy
    • Society
    • Living
    • Infographics
  • Trends
  • About Us
  • Basket
  • Gerald Flurry
  • Watch
    • Key of David TV Program
    • Trumpet Daily Program
    • Life and Teachings Program
    • Trumpet World Program
    • Trumpet Videos
  • Listen
  • Library
    • Books and Booklets
    • Trumpet Magazine
    • Bible Correspondence Course
    • Reprint Articles
    • Trumpet Brief E-mail Newsletter
    • Renew Trumpet Subscription
  • Sections
    • Anglo-America
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • Economy
    • Society
    • Living
    • Infographics
  • Trends
  • About Us
  • Basket

Arguing in a Circle

Arguing in a Circle

Arguing in a Circle

From The March 2026 Philadelphia Trumpet
View Issue FREE Subscription

The following is an excerpt from the Autobiography of Herbert W. Armstrong concerning the result of his intensive study into the question of origins and the foundation of the theory of evolution:

I came to see that there was only one possible proof of evolution as a fact. That was the assumption that, in the study of paleontology, the most simple fossils were always in the oldest strata, laid down first; while, as we progress into strata of later deposition, the fossils found in them become gradually more complex, tending toward advancing intelligence.

That one claim, I finally determined, was the trunk of the tree of evolution. If the trunk stood, the theory appeared proved. If I could chop down the trunk, the entire tree would fall with it.

I began a search to learn how these scientists determined the age of strata. I was months finding it. None of the texts I searched seemed to explain anything about it. This trunk of the tree was carelessly assumed—without proof.

Were the oldest strata always on the bottom—the next oldest next to the bottom, the most recent on the top? Finally I found it in a recognized text on geology authored by Prof. Thomas Chrowder Chamberlin. No, sometimes the most recent were actually below the most ancient strata. The age of strata was not determined by stages of depth. The depth of strata varied in different parts of the world.

How, then, was the age of strata determined? Why, I finally discovered in this very reputable authority, their age was determined by the fossils found in them. Since the geologists “knew” their evolutionary theory was true, and since they had estimated how many millions of years ago a certain fossil specimen might have lived, that age determined the age of the strata!

In other words, they assumed the age of the strata by the supposition that their theory of evolution was true. And they “proved” their theory was true by the supposition of the progressive ages of the strata in which fossil remains had been found! This was arguing in a circle!

The trunk of the evolutionary tree was chopped down. There was no proof!

From The March 2026 Philadelphia Trumpet
View Issue FREE Subscription
Next
  • Resisting Barbarism
Previous
  • A True Christian Cannot Believe in Evolution

𝕏

theTrumpet.com
About Us
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Copyright © 2026 Philadelphia Church of God, All Rights Reserved