Voyager 1 Reaches the Edge of the Solar System

Voyager 1 Reaches the Edge of the Solar System


The Voyager 1 spacecraft has just drifted beyond the reach of our solar system, according to a paper published in the Geophysical Research Letters journal on March 20. It will be the first man-made object to travel so far from home.

According to researcher Bill Webber, Voyager 1 passed through what is known as the “heliocliff” on August 25 last year, citing the detection of a dramatic fall in radiation emitted from the sun. Beyond the influence of the sun, Voyager-1 continues its voyage onward.

Speculation remains as to whether the Voyager 1 probe has arrived in interstellar space or an undefined region beyond the solar system. Upon its arrival on the edge, a change in the direction of the sun’s magnetic field should be observed as it is acted on by interstellar magnetic fields. This has not happened, leading some to speculate that the probe is now in a no-man’s-land between Earth and the vast emptiness that divides our solar system from the next one.

Voyager 1 has had a long journey. Launched in September 1977 from Cape Canaveral, Voyager 1 was sent to observe the outer planets and the interstellar region beyond the solar system. Following the completion of the first part of its journey, it set off for the far reaches of space and was followed by its counterpart Voyager 2.

The fact that the two probes are still traveling is a marvel in itself. They run off of basic 1970s equipment. Each one has 68 kilobytes of computer memory. An average iPod today has over 240,000 times that much memory. However, those 68K are still doing the job. Radio waves are still being bounced back across the solar system. It takes these waves 16 hours to traverse the distance between man and machine.

So far, Voyager 1 has traversed across 18 billion kilometers of space. It is powered by a plutonium power source which is set to stop generating electricity in 10 to 15 years. At that point, the probe will go silent and drift on through the darkness alone.

It is incredible to see what man has been able to achieve. He has sent out technology that broadcasts information back across the universe. Voyager 1 is a fantastic piece of technology. But it also raises a larger question.

Herbert W. Armstrong, founder of the Worldwide Church of God, wrote in his book Mystery of the Ages, “Why do we find a world of awesome advancement and progress, yet paradoxically with appalling and mounting evils? Why cannot the minds that develop spacecraft, computers and marvels of science, technology and industry solve the problems that demonstrate human helplessness?”

Though mankind has made amazing advancements across the fields of technology, we have yet to bring about world peace. War ravages the planet, millions live in poverty, and millions more go without basic education or a reasonable standard of living. Man finds it easier to peer over the precipice of the solar system than to solve the crisis that faces him on Earth.

But this world is not without hope. The galaxies that Voyager 1 is slowly drifting towards are directly connected to the future of mankind. Man has a potential that exists among the stars. In all reality, mankind will reach those distant solar systems before Voyager 1 ever will! It will be over 40,000 years before that probe will come even close to another star.

Read Our Awesome Universe Potential to see what God has in store for those who will heed his message. The Voyager 1 trip to the edge of the solar system doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface.

What Is the Abomination of Desolation?

Just what is the abomination of desolation? According to your Bible, we need to understand what it is in detail to escape the worst suffering ever coming upon this Earth. The Bible says it is a sign of when God’s very elect are to flee. But to flee from what? Christ personally talked about it when He was on this Earth. And those prophecies that Christ talked about are certainly being fulfilled today. There never has been a more exciting time to live, but also, there’s never been a more dangerous time than what we’re living in today.

Argentina Recruits Pope in Falklands Dispute

Argentina’s president met with Pope Francis in Rome on Monday to solicit his help against Britain. President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner requested that the pope intercede to “facilitate dialogue” over Britain’s Falkland Islands, which lie off the coast of Argentina. Buenos Aires claims that it has jurisdiction over the islands, and calls them the Malvinas.

In the past, relations between the two have been cold. Before he was elected pope, Jorge Mario Bergoglio accused Kirchner’s government of demagoguery. He also opposed homosexual adoption, a stance that she compared to the Dark Ages and the Inquisition. However, these differences were set aside at Monday’s meeting.

It remains to be seen how much Pope Francis will intervene in the Falklands, but his Argentine roots may be bad news for Britain.

On Friday, political economist Rodney Atkinson drew attention to the Catholic Church’s historical antagonism toward Britain, saying that the Vatican has threatened British sovereignty for almost a millennium.

Continue to watch the Falklands conflict. With help from the Roman Catholic Church and the European Union, Argentina may be able to force Britain to relinquish its sovereignty. For more information, read “Empire’s Last Hurrah.”

Cyprus—the Russian Angle

Cyprus—the Russian Angle


One commentator gives an intriguing observation about Russo/German antics in Cyprus.

Sometimes a non-mainstream observer of the world scene comes up with real food for thought. Such was the case this week when British blogger Alexander Boot reflected on the actions of Russia and Germany in regard to the Cyprus situation.

Boot asks an obvious question, “The question is why the ecb and imf, which is to say Germany, made this raid a precondition for the bailout of Cyprus? After all, they were more lenient when bailing out Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain. Why single out Cyprus for rough treatment?” (March 19).

Attending to his own question, Boot retorts, “The answer is obvious: Cyprus is a floating refuge and laundromat for dirty Russian money.”

But he then goes on to address the larger strategic question of why Russia is so enmeshed with Cyprus: “But it’s more than just about exerting influence on Cypriot politics—potentially the Russians hope to gain the elusive prize they’ve been pursuing since the late 16th century: a foothold on the Mediterranean.”

Then Alexander Boot points to the numerous strategic deals concluded both in secret and, where convenient, in the public eye between Russia and Germany: “The 1922 Rapallo Treaty, the 1926 Treaty of Berlin, the 1939 Non-Aggression Pact and Treaty of Friendship all had their secret protocols that left the rest of the world none the wiser.”

Boot then makes an intriguing observation: “The German raid on Russian money in Cyprus (to call a spade a spade) is ostensibly perceived in Russia as a direct attack. Putin immediately described it as ‘unfair, unprofessional and dangerous,’ but one can almost see his eyes light up.

“For, unlike the previous German attack [World War ii], this one can conceivably turn Russia into a Mediterranean power. Gazprom, the world’s biggest producer of natural gas, has already offered to restructure Cyprus’s debt in exchange for exclusive exploration rights on the island. The Russians are also prepared to underwrite the whole bailout for the right to use a naval base on the island.”

So where are these latest Russo-German shenanigans over the Mediterranean leading?

Boot maintains that “It’s highly unlikely though that the Germans didn’t consider the Russian angle before launching their confiscatory raid. Yet they pressed ahead, which raises all sorts of possibilities.

Could it be that yet another deal between Germany and Russia has been struck? After all, historically the two countries have demonstrated their ability to conclude secret treaties whose ramifications become known only decades later. … [T]he propensity for underhand, backstage dealing in both the EU and Russia leaves much room for educated guesses” (emphasis added).

Five years ago, Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry indicated that behind closed doors, Russia and Germany may well have already made a pact.

Whether that pact included a deal that would give Russia access to Mediterranean ports is unknown. Perhaps the ink is not yet dry on that score. Either way, as our editor in chief has declared, Germany, now holding the whip hand over the strategic island nation of Cyprus, will not yield its ground. But that does not discount a friendly, though temporary, deal between Russia and Germany over bailing out Cyprus banks in exchange for free, though again temporary, access to its port facilities. Such a deal would have to at least be seen to work in the short-term strategic interests of both nations. A tradeoff on access to energy resources could be the catalyst.

Keep watching Cyprus for the outcome of the grand game of control of Europe’s “soft underbelly,” as Winston Churchill called it, the highly strategic Mediterranean Sea.

Our booklet Germany and the Holy Roman Empire gives greater detail on the developing situation in the Mediterranean.

Coming: Inner-Core Europe—and War!

Coming: Inner-Core Europe—and War!


A German think tank predicts the prospect of a prosperous inner-core Europe clashing with a poorer periphery.

In a harbinger of the prophesied inner core of 10 European entities to prevail in Europe under the sway of the Rome/Berlin axis (Revelation 17:12-13), a German think tank has highlighted the prospect of the European Union breaking up into a core Europe under German domination—versus the rest. reports that the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, a think tank associated with the main German opposition party (Social Democratic Party) has “developed four possible scenarios for the future development of the EU under the pressure of the euro crisis” (March 20; translation ours).

Of the four scenarios outlined in a recent report, the foundation believes that the most likely outcome of the current euro crisis will be “the formation of a smaller union around the German center (‘Kerneuropa’), while the EU continues parallel in the form of a sort of greater free trade zone” (ibid). Inevitably, that “free trade zone” would be subject to the diktat of the more powerful inner core, directed by Germany.

Of real concern is the foundation’s conclusion that such an outcome would bring with it “a dramatic impoverishment of EU peripheries as well as a possible total breakdown of the eurozone.”

This report by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung goes on to observe that historically, the collapse of alliances such as the European Union has inevitably led to war. It points to the 1990s collapse of greater Yugoslavia as being a case in point: “The Ebert-Stiftung calls to remembrance that the decay of state-run unions can absolutely end in violence: One has to take this danger ‘seriously,’ it warned, with a specific reference to the former Yugoslavia” (ibid).

When one considers that it was Germany and the Vatican that lit the powder keg of the Balkan wars in a deliberate effort to break up that “state-run union” and deliver the Balkan Peninsula to the control of the Rome/Berlin axis, one surely has to consider a similar scenario as being a possible outcome of the European Union project—a German project under the spiritual influence of Rome from its beginning.

Read our booklet Germany’s Conquest of the Balkans for more detail on this subject and its final outcome.

EU Keeps Arms Embargo in Place Against Syrian Rebels

European Union leaders agreed on Friday that they will maintain their weapons embargo against Syria’s rebels. The decision came in spite of requests from Britain and France. Both countries have pressured the EU to lift its embargo so that they can send weapons to rebels fighting against Syrian President Bashar Assad.

In spite of the decision, British Prime Minister David Cameron said that his government has not ruled out its options for helping the opposition.

“Britain is a sovereign country, we have our own foreign security and defense policies. If we want to take individual actions we think that is in our national interest, of course we are free to do so.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Britain and France against operating outside of EU channels. She warned them to be “very careful” of going against Germany’s wishes.

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned last Wednesday that Moscow considers arming Syria’s rebels a breach of international law. Although Russia continues to support the Assad regime, that support has softened over recent months. Coupled with the fact that Berlin is keeping weapons out of the hands of Syrian rebels, this may indicate that Russia and Germany are reaching an agreement on Syria.

Bible prophecy predicts the end result of Syria’s ongoing war: a Syrian government that will distance itself from Iran and ally with Europe instead. As the Syrian conflict grinds on, pay special attention to German-Russian relations. For more information, read “Russia and Europe Moving Toward a Deal on Syria?” and “A Mysterious Prophecy.”