Who’s next?
The Biden Administration’s National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism is, by its own admission, the first of its kind. The authors call it “America’s first government-wide national Strategy” to eradicate internal opponents of the regime—that is, not only to deter “violent extremism,” but even, in the words of Biden’s opening memo, “to root out the hatreds that can too often drive violence.”
This unprecedented state intervention into every level of American life is justified, the Administration claims, by the unrest that occurred at the Capitol on January 6. That event, while regrettable and ill-judged, has also been thoroughly mythologized into a veritable Reichstag Fire by Democrat politicians, Republican enablers, and a chorus of willing journalists…
But in this administration, and in the Strategy itself, we know where the focus is and will remain: squarely on those 80-some million Americans who will not stand to see their country overrun by a sadistic Monoparty. If you do not want to see the American way of life twisted into an enforced racial hierarchy and the apparatus of the state aimed squarely against the natural family, the Biden Administration has now announced that it has its eyes on you.
They do not really mind, in the end, if you realize this. In its most frank passages, the Strategy practically dares readers to notice its naked assertions of power. “Today’s domestic terrorists espouse a range of violent ideological motivations, including racial or ethnic bigotry and hatred as well as anti-government or anti-authority sentiment.” Dissent is terrorism and will be prosecuted as such: they know what they sound like. They know you can hear them. They just don’t think you can do anything about it…
It is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes to define political action by the opposition as inherently violent and morally unconscionable. When one side can riot, loot, and murder with official sanction, while the other cannot so much as organize without risking a summary imprisonment of indefinite duration, there are not really two sides anymore at all.
In testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Brennan said that in late July 2016 a group of cia, fbi and National Security Agency officials began to investigate allegations of Russian interference. And in a later interview, he admitted that he personally gave the fbi leads involving “contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign.” The fbi used this information to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the Trump campaign and started discussing how to get a fisa warrant so they could use all the power of the intelligence community to spy on anybody they wanted.
These admissions should trouble anyone who does not want to live in a cia surveillance state.
In the 1970s, Sen. Frank Church led an investigation into cia and fbi activities and warned that these agencies were developing some alarming abilities. On nbc’s Meet the Press in 1975, he said: “If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know ….”
Shortly after Obama was elected to a second term, the public learned that the nsa has a data warehouse in Utah, a “billion-dollar epicenter” where it can store massive amounts of information. Microsoft, Yahoo!, Google, Facebook, YouTube, aol, Skype, PalTalk and Apple were caught handing over to the government all kinds of information about U.S. citizens—phone records, e-mails and other digital communications—and they claimed they were forced to do so. William Binney, a 32-year veteran of the nsa turned whistle-blower, was asked where the surveillance data was heading. He said: “It’s really a turnkey situation, where it can be turned quickly and become a totalitarian state pretty quickly. The capacities to do that is being set up.”
That chilling statement gets to the heart of the issue!
Barack Obama and his administration tried to use the power of the cia, nsa and fbi to create a dossier of propaganda against a political rival, use the dossier to spy on an American citizen, and frame Donald Trump of a crime he did not commit. And he almost succeeded! That is how close we came to a Marxist tyranny in America.
The American people are still learning the full extent to which Barack Obama was personally directing this treasonous plot against Donald Trump. And the only reason we know as much as we do is because Congressman Devin Nunes pressured the fbi into providing congressional committees with 384 pages of text messages between Strzok and Lisa Page. The fbi turned these messages over to Congress on Jan. 16, 2018 (please request my free booklet January 16: God’s Miracle Day for a detailed explanation of why this calendar date is so significant). These text messages revealed that the 17 treasonous crimes outlined in the Horowitz report were not just the result of some overly zealous intern at the fbi. Instead, they revealed that “potus wants to know everything we’re doing,” and, “The White House is running this.’”
Something deadly dangerous has seized the country — far more than people realize. There is a spiritual dimension to what is happening, and you cannot understand these events unless you recognize that.
