Iran Now Controls Four Middle Eastern Capitals


Iran Now Controls Four Middle Eastern Capitals

Some of the world’s most famous cities have become property of Iran. Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut—the list is growing.

Iran now controls the capital cities in four Middle Eastern nations. The Jerusalem Post reported February 8 that “Yemen falls to Iran in regional proxy war.” You will never guess who helped Iran take over this United States ally. From the Post (emphasis added throughout):

The toppling of the Yemeni government by Iranian backed Shiite Houthis has upped the ante in the regional sectarian Sunni-Shiite struggle.Yemen is perfectly set to become a sectarian war that will see millions more in foreign funds transferred to various proxy forces in the country ….Sunni states are likely to dramatically increase support for their brothers in the country, not holding back funds from jihadists and other Islamists, just as has been done in Syria.Iran and its allies in the region are not going to sit by either.

Since 2009, America has been conducting an aggressive drone warfare campaign over Yemen. Unwilling to commit ground troops to fight al Qaeda, America convinced the Yemeni government to allow it to drop bombs on al Qaeda suspects. Attacks have occurred in the countryside, at isolated compounds, and on streets outside busy restaurants.

International Security documented 120 attacks reported by the media. Over 800 people have been killed, including 83 civilians. The seemingly indiscriminate nature of drone warfare helped reduce support for the local government, which ruled a population that was already very anti-American. The Yemeni government took a great risk to partner with America.

Yemen was supposed to be the role model for how to fight wars without having to get your hands dirty. It was supposed to work by pairing American airpower with a campaign of building local allies to fight on the ground.

In Yemen, America’s ground allies lost.

Yet what makes this defeat doubly disastrous isn’t that the drone warfare campaign probably contributed to the local government’s waning support, but that it was America who put the final nail in the coffin of the supposedly “U.S-backed” Yemeni government. The Jerusalem Post alludes to this issue (ibid):

And then there is the question of the world superpowers, which we can expect will intervene as they have in Syria, with the U.S. increasingly favoring the Shiite axis, led by Iran, as it does not want to ruin ongoing nuclear negotiations with the country. It also seeks to use Iran to counter Sunni jihadists such as Islamic State and al Qaeda. Recent reports reveal that the U.S. is cooperating with the Houthis to target al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (aqap).

America working with an Iranian-backed militant group that overthrew America’s ally is shocking.

What’s more shocking is when America started working with the Houthis. The Wall Street Journal explains in its January 29 article “In Strategic Shift, U.S. Draws Closer to Yemeni Rebels”:

The U.S. has formed ties with Houthi rebels who seized control of Yemen’s capital, White House officials and rebel commanders said, in the clearest indication of a shift in the U.S. approach ….American officials are communicating with Houthi fighters, largely through intermediaries, the officials and commanders have disclosed, to promote a stable political transition as the Houthis gain more power ….Washington’s outreach to the Houthis, who in January routed forces loyal to President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, a close American ally, represents a contrast from years of U.S. support for the Hadi government, which the Houthis have opposed.The shift also could place it on the same side as Iran in the Yemen conflict. … U.S. officials believe the militia has received considerable funding and arms from Shiite-dominated Iran, something Houthi leaders have variously confirmed and denied.White House and State Department officials confirmed to the Wall Street Journal the contacts with the Houthis, but stressed they were focused on promoting political stability in Yemen and safeguarding the security of Americans. …U.S. officials said they also are seeking to harness the Houthis’ concurrent war on aqap to weaken the terrorist organization’s grip on havens in Yemen’s west and south. …Houthi commanders, in recent interviews conducted in Yemen, asserted that the U.S. began sharing intelligence on aqap positions in November ….In November, a Houthi representative visited Washington for several days to attend a United Nations Development Program-sponsored dialogue to promote Yemen’s economic development. …[A] Houthi official in Sanaa who deals with Iran says assistance comes in the form of logistics, intelligence and cash. He said Houthis have received tens of millions of dollars in cash from Iran over the past couple of years. …U.S. cooperation with the Houthis could further complicate its relationship with Saudi Arabia and the leading Sunni states in the Persian Gulf.Washington and Riyadh have been partnering in trying to stabilize Mr. Hadi’s government. But Arab officials have voiced alarm about the Houthis control of Sanaa, viewing it as a major regional victory for Tehran.”American contacts with the Houthis would likely unnerve the Saudis,” said Emile Hokayem, an expert on the Persian Gulf at London’s International Institute for Security Studies. “Saudis are already nervous about U.S. policy in the Middle East and the sense that Washington is no longer interested in containing, let alone countering, what they see as Iran-allied Shia militias.” …

America was working with the Iranian sponsored Houthis as far back as at least November, helping them in their battles—long before the Houthis overthrew the American allied government.

So it appears as if the decision to let the Yemeni government fall was a strategic one. But one that will leave America’s other allies to wonder how trustworthy America is. In Yemen, America was the kind of ally you don’t want.

Sadly, America will see little benefit from its loss of prestige and reputation in Yemen. The whole situation could quickly turn into a disaster—especially if America continues to support the Houthis’ war.

The Houthis are pushing south and west in an effort to eliminate al Qaeda from the Red Sea/Bab el-Mandeb strait coastal area. If they gain control, the geopolitical consequences could be very far reaching.

Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry reported on the significance of the Houthi takeover of Yemen. The Houthis, and by extension Iran, are about to gain control over one of the world’s most strategic waterways. Gerald Flurry explains the implications on oil markets, global trade, European security and more in his latest Key of David program, “The Yemen Crisis.” You need to watch it.

The Jerusalem Post concludes by quoting Uzi Rabi, a Yemen expert and director of the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Tel Aviv University (op. cit.):

This situation is a theater where the Sunni-Shiite battle is being played out in the region, with the Saudis on one side and the Iranians on the other, he continued, adding that the country also is a gateway to Africa and the Islamist terror there.Iran sees itself as the rising power in the region, Rabi told the Post in December, adding that an Iranian Revolutionary Guard official was quoted as saying that the Islamic Republic of Iran now controls four Middle Eastern capitals: Sanaa, Beirut, Baghdad and Damascus.

Watch as Iran looks to add more capital cities to that list. A couple of candidates: Cairo and Tripoli. Iran is working hard to exploit the chaos in Libya, and it almost got its way in Cairo when the Muslim Brotherhood initially overthrew Egypt’s military leaders. To understand why these nations are destined to fall into Iran’s orbit read “Egypt and Libya to Join Iran’s Terror Network.”