Pentagon Modernizing Nuclear Weapons in Europe

Pentagon Modernizing Nuclear Weapons in Europe

Torquetum/iStockphoto

Why this may end up being the worst money it ever spent

The military will upgrade its aging European nuclear weapons stockpile, it was announced on Tuesday. Pentagon officials indicated it was now or never for the upgrade. With a $10 billion price tag, this may be America’s costliest mistake ever.

According to military officials, the upgrade will include modernized delivery systems, refurbished warheads, and changes to the weapons’ production complex.

“Old parts mean less-safe nukes,” says John Noonan, a former nuclear missile officer and a spokesman for the House Armed Services Committee. “Sixty years without an accidental detonation. We have a keen interest in keeping that record going.”

Opponents of the upgrade cite America’s looming budget issues. With a defense budget facing billions of dollars’ worth of cuts, some people wonder why America would upgrade its European stockpile when its positioning has become somewhat redundant. America has thousands of intercontinental ballistic missiles that can deliver the bombs.

Yet this upgrade to the European nuclear weapons stockpile may prove costly in other ways too.

For years, the European Union has been lobbying to inherit nato weaponry based in Europe. EU officials want to capitalize on America’s shrinking military presence in Europe by taking control of equipment that is too expensive to ship back overseas.

The real cost to America may be that at some point America will decide to simply transfer responsibility for its nuclear arsenal to the EU as it takes a greater responsibility for defending itself.

The obvious risk, however, is that Europe will not always be America’s ally. Already many EU member states have close relationships with Russia, China and other U.S. competitors.

America should not put so much trust in Europe. For many years the Trumpet has warned that America will become a victim of a European double cross.

In a 1980 article titled “Where Does the U.S. Go From Here?” Herbert W. Armstrong wrote about the risk America was taking with Europe:

You may be sure the West European leaders are conferring hurriedly and secretly about how and how soon they may unite and provide a united European military force so they can defend themselves! And so they will no longer have to give in meekly to Russia! And who will they blame for their humiliation and their necessity now to have a united Europe, with a united government, a common currency, and a common military force as great or greater than either the ussr or the usa? They will blame the United States!And when they are strong enough to assert themselves, Bible prophecy reveals a man will rise to take the helm in Europe and will first attack Britain for standing firm with the United States, and then they will return a lot of hydrogen bombs the U.S. has stored now in Europe!

Since Mr. Armstrong wrote that, Europe has united into a union, it has adopted a common currency, it has made huge strides toward a centralized overarching government, and now it is in the process of developing a united military force—it has already created rapid reaction forces composed of troops from various countries.

It will not be long before, as Mr. Armstrong warned, European states will be “strong enough to assert themselves.”

After that, as Bible prophecy indicates, a lot of nuclear bombs will be heading back toward America.

That $10 billion nuclear upgrade will be the worst money America ever spent.

Germany to Send Missiles to Turkey in NATO Mission

Germany to Send Missiles to Turkey in NATO Mission

JOHN THYS/AFP/Getty Images

The German cabinet approved the deployment of two Patriot missile systems to Turkey, with supporting soldiers, command staff, air crews and commandos on Thursday. The Netherlands and the U.S. are also expected to send a couple of Patriot batteries each.

The mandate will allow Germany to send up to 400 troops with the batteries. One hundred and seventy of these are required to operate the missiles. More will help man nato Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft (awacs) that are already stationed in the area. Dozens others will work on the nato command staff. The mandate also allows Germany to send 50 other soldiers.

The German parliament is expected to give its approval to the arrangement between December 12 and 14. They are expected to send the batteries by sea, arriving in around a month.

“Syria has a not insignificant ballistic missile capability,” said German Defense Minister Thomas de Maiziere. “A few hundred with a range of some 700 kilometers that could possibly hit a large part of Turkey. The Syrian government has shown no intention of using these rockets but we want it to remain that way.”

“Nobody knows what such a regime is capable of and that is why we are acting protectively here,” said Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle.

German officials insisted that the missiles will only intercept Syrian weapons within Turkish airspace and are programmed not to cross the Syrian border.

Germany already has a military presence south of Syria in Lebanon, and its navy patrols off of Lebanon’s coast. Though small, this deployment expands Germany’s presence in the region, which increases the Germans’ knowledge of how to operate in it.

The Trumpet has long forecast that Germany would forge a strong alliance with Turkey.

For more information on Germany’s goals in the region, read our article “Next in Line, Please” from our December 2012 issue.

Reconfigure Your Life Around God

Four important keys to successful time management.

Morsi Pushes Forward Amid Egyptian Protests

Morsi Pushes Forward Amid Egyptian Protests

REUTERS/Handout

Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi was forced to leave the presidential palace on Tuesday after tens of thousands of protestors descended upon it in opposition to a presidential decree that places Morsi above judicial oversight. The protests have gone on for 12 straight days since Morsi issued the decree on November 22. Police fired tear gas to disperse the crowd as they climbed atop military vehicles that surrounded the complex and spray-painted anti-Islamist slogans on the security walls. Protestors shouted “leave, leave” and “the people want to topple the regime,” two well-known chants from the Arab Spring revolts that toppled Mubarak in 2011. Though Morsi’s spokesman said the president left the palace at the end of his work schedule through the door he usually used, one anonymous official said Morsi left on the advice of security officials at the palace.

However, the following day Morsi was back at the palace, hard at work.

Since Morsi handed himself dictatorial-like power on November 22, he and the Muslim Brotherhood have worked tirelessly to ramrod through a new pro-Islamic constitution for Egypt. Working quickly and ruthlessly, they have succeeded in putting Egypt on track to become an Islamic state. As Hassan Nafaa, a professor of political science at Cairo University, said, “The Muslim Brotherhood is determined to go ahead with its own plans regardless of everybody else. There is no compromise on the horizon.”

The events from this past weekend attest to that.

The constitutional assembly tasked with drafting Egypt’s new constitution worked tirelessly through the day, night, and into the next morning of November 29 and 30 to pass the most recent draft. Originally containing Muslim, Christian, and liberal members, the assembly has faced heavy criticism for being heavily dominated by Muslims. Because of this, all the Christian members left the assembly, leaving the remaining liberals to be pushed aside while the Muslim majority pushed the draft through.

The assembly’s timing in passing the draft narrowly beat out a vote from the Supreme Constitutional Court to dissolve the controversial assembly. The court was scheduled to vote on the legitimacy of both the constitutional assembly and the upper parliament on Sunday. The Muslim Brotherhood responded by staging a protest in front of the Supreme Constitutional Court, baring access to the building, and effectively giving the legislative branch of government immunity from judicial interruptions. The constitutional draft was successfully passed in the assembly before the Supreme Court’s decision was finalized.

When Morsi granted himself near-absolute power, above review of the courts, he also declared that same power for the constitutional assembly as well. Morsi was thus enabled to pass the constitution through without incident. (The courts had previously dissolved the first two drafting committees.) The Muslim Brotherhood has since rushed to defend Morsi, blaming the judges for forcing Morsi to take full power. “[T]he court’s judges are loyalists of ousted president Hosni Mubarak,” they claimed, “who appointed them to their positions, and are trying to derail the country’s transition to democratic rule.”

Activists have claimed that the Brotherhood has been paying gangs of men to “beat male protestors and sexually assault women” who were protesting against Morsi in Tahrir Square on Friday. According to the activists, 20 such attacks have been reported in the past 10 days. The Times spoke to two men who both admitted that they belonged to a group of 65 men who were paid to “sexually harass girls so they leave the demonstration,” and cause disruptions to disperse protesters and instill fear.

The Brotherhood also staged a couple of its own rallies over the weekend to counterbalance the protestors. The first one they staged on Saturday was bolstered in numbers when the Brotherhood chartered hundreds of busses to “bring masses of Islamic activists into the capital.” The second protest began on Sunday outside the Supreme Constitutional Court and continued for days.

Though Morsi’s sudden power grab has brought him a lot of criticism from his own nation and the international community, don’t expect it to dissuade the Islamists from their ultimate objective: the radicalization of Egypt. Radical Islam will not back down—so says biblical prophecy. For years, Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry has prophesied that Egypt would turn radical and align with Iran. Don’t expect America to oust this new dictator, or for the Egyptian people to overthrow him like they did Mubarak. Egypt’s course is set.

America’s Deadly Addiction

Is Venezuela on the Verge of a Roman Catholic Spring?

Is Venezuela on the Verge of a Roman Catholic Spring?

EITAN ABRAMOVICH/AFP/GettyImages

The impending death of socialist autocrat Hugo Chávez could kick off a Roman Catholic Spring that would realign Venezuela with a European-based Holy Roman Empire.

Rumors of regime change are swirling through Venezuela as strongman Hugo Chávez is once again heading to Cuba for medical treatment.

Though Chávez has repeatedly dismissed rumors that he has not been cured of his cancer, his last public appearance was a televised interview three weeks ago, and the Spanish-language newspaper ABC is claiming he is suffering bone metastasis from his pelvic cancer.

If Chávez dies within the next four years, Venezuela could undergo an extended period of instability followed by a political transition on a scale that the country has not seen since Chávez first came to power in 1999, according to the Austin-based geopolitical think tank Stratfor.

So far, Chávez has made no concrete plans for his succession. So if he dies, resigns or is permanently incapacitated within the next four years, new elections have to be called.

In the event of an unexpected snap election of this sort, a unified opposition—likely behind former presidential candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski—would stand its best chance in over a decade.

Such a change in leadership probably would not profoundly affect domestic policy in Venezuela, considering that Capriles espouses a watered-down version of Chávez-style socialism. Foreign policy, however, would experience a seismic shift under opposition leadership.

Under the anti-American Chávez, Venezuela has moved closer to nations like Russia, China, Nicaragua, Cuba and Iran. The nominally Catholic leader, who has spent much time praising the socialist ideals of atheists like Karl Marx, has also increased tensions between the Venezuelan government and the Vatican.

This foreign policy could hardly be more different from the espoused policies of opposition leader Capriles. The self-described “devout Catholic” studied at the Catholic University in Caracas, and says the first thing he will do if he ever comes to power is to pay homage to the Virgin Mary.

Once this homage is paid, Capriles has vowed to cancel all of Venezuela’s Russian arms deals, review all of Venezuela’s current oil contracts and seriously consider ending Venezuela’s cozy relationship with Iran.

Such policies in Venezuela would no doubt greatly please Pope Benedict xvi and his Vatican hierarchy. The Wikileaks scandal recently exposed a conversation between an American ambassador and Vatican Archbishop Leonardo Sandri, who is widely regarded as the third-most powerful man in Rome.

In this conversation, Sandri admitted that the arch-conservative pope is deeply concerned about the general leftward shift in Latin America. He mentioned that he personally regards Chávez as a dangerous man and went on to say that the pope fears that several other Latin American leaders are looking to men like Chávez and Castro for leadership.

For the time being, Archbishop Sandri has confirmed that Rome is committed to a non-confrontational approach to the problem of Hugo Chávez. Perhaps rumors of Chávez’s declining health have convinced the pope that patience is the best policy, especially considering the pro-Vatican sentiments of Venezuela’s primary opposition party.

The impending death of Hugo Chávez could indeed allow opposition forces to rise to power in Venezuela, kicking off a sort of “Roman Catholic spring.” In fact, Bible prophecy indicates this will happen!

In the 17th and 18th chapters of the biblical book of Revelation, God labels the German-led, Vatican-influenced empire that is currently emerging in Europe as “Babylon the Great.” In the corresponding Old Testament prophecies of Isaiah 23 and Ezekiel 27, the same empire appears under the name of Tyre, the most powerful trading center of the ancient Mediterranean world.

Based on these scriptures, Herbert W. Armstrong long predicted that the alliance between Europe and South America would grow extremely strong. The most significant factors that will cement this alliance are the Roman Catholic religion and the Spanish language. This union, however, will not be a union of equals: The Latin American countries will again become vassal states to the Holy Roman Empire!

As the July 1965 Plain Truth foretold, “Flowing across the Atlantic to feed the hungry furnaces of the Ruhr and the other industrial complexes of Europe will come the rich mineral wealth of Latin America.”

More is prophesied for this European empire, however, than a mere trade alliance with Latin America. In Isaiah 10, God says Assyria (modern-day Germany) would be the rod of His anger used to punish the hypocritical nations of Israel (modern-day America, Britain and its dominions) and Judah (the Jewish state of Israel). Isaiah 23 sheds further light on this prophecy by foretelling a great economic siege that is to be set up against the United States.

Consider the following section from Chapter Seven of editor in chief Gerald Flurry’s book, Isaiah’s End-Time Vision:

With a German-led Europe (the king of the north) possessing great maritime power, North America will be surrounded on the east by Europe and the south by Latin America. The Bible contains many prophecies of that European power attacking America—and many other prophecies of America being besieged.That is where China and the giants of Asia enter the picture. When the Holy Roman Empire attacks North America, there will be no help or sympathy from Asia. In fact, considering that China has come to possess most of the world’s strategic sea gates (which, ironically, at one time were held by Britain and America), we believe there may be a brief alliance between the German-led Holy Roman Empire and certain Asian powers (Russia, China, Japan—the kings of the east). Should Europe, the resurrected Holy Roman Empire, find a way to take advantage—even for a moment—of key resources and strategic holdings of China, Russia and Japan, it would have more than enough power to besiege the Anglo-Saxon nations and enslave them.

Germany and the Vatican are building a transcontinental alliance that will ultimately include 10 European kings, a loyal network of Latin American vassal states and an anti-Iranian alliance of Arabic regimes.

With its left arm, this Vatican-dominated conglomerate will reach down southward and eastward into the Middle East to conquer the Holy City Jerusalem. Then with its right arm, this “Holy” Roman Empire will reach southward and westward across the Atlantic to take control of Latin America and besiege the United States!

Reports coming out of Turkey, Syria, Arabia, Brazil and Venezuela show that the Germany/Vatican axis is already laying the groundwork for its transcontinental empire.