War in ’24
Later this year, according to the Constitution, the United States will hold its next election. The war for the presidency is about to become unavoidable, nationwide.
Large numbers of Americans openly state that the 2020 election was stolen, and tens of millions want to vote President Donald Trump back into office.
But radical leftists in corporate media suites, judges’ chambers, prosecutors’ offices, the West Wing and Kalorama are trying to block these people from ever even seeing the name “Donald J. Trump” on a ballot in the first place.
They will do anything. They will stoop to any level, contravene any standard, trash any reputation, commit any injustice, bend any rule, tell any lie, and break any law—including the Constitution of the United States of America. They will commit treason. In fact, they already have. So they won’t back down now: 2024 means total political and legal war.
The regime media is deploying its myriad budgets, story assignments, interview invitations, video edits, camera angles, publishing deals, advertising agreements, promotions, demotions, charmers, fire-breathers and other talking heads to monsterize the man who wants to “make America great again.” But polls, caucuses and rally attendance figures all show that, if Americans are allowed to exercise their one and only direct means of controlling their government and vote for the representatives of their choice, they will choose Donald Trump.
Desperate, leftists are resorting to more drastic strategies. Some have even floated the idea of assassination. Yet short of outright murder, the tactic they are pushing hardest right now is lawfare designed to bar him from even the possibility of office.
Radical Lawfare
The lawfare against President Trump is truly unprecedented. He has been impeached twice—once for trying to expose Biden family corruption in Ukraine (which abundant evidence has proved to be true) and once for trying to expose the theft of the 2020 presidential election (which abundant evidence has proved to be true).
After more than 234 years of American presidential history yielded zero felony indictments, radical prosecutors charged President Trump with four such indictments in five months last year, formally accusing him of no less than 91 felonies and scheduling trial dates for the middle of the presidential campaign. Acting on the urging of certain district attorneys, grand juries in New York, Florida and Georgia indicted him on accusations of funding his campaign by paying a pornographic actress for a non-disclosure agreement, of possessing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence after leaving the White House, and of litigating against the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.
In addition to invented legal theories and other weaknesses in these cases, it is emerging that the people behind them are immoral and corrupt. In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is alleged to have committed adultery with a Fulton County special prosecutor who bought her lavish getaways using legal fees he received from the Biden regime—and which he hid from the court during his divorce from his wife and stay-at-home mother of 20 years. In addition to this, and more importantly, these prosecutions appear to be in collusion with the White House. According to Fox News, both Willis and New York Attorney General Letitia James have visited the White House, apparently to coordinate their targeting of Trump with the man who stole his presidency.
Fox host Jesse Watters said, “It’s almost as if Biden is running the Trump prosecutions from the White House.” That is a good choice of words—not because it’s not quite collusion but because it’s not quite Biden who is running it.
The man running the Trump prosecutions isn’t the 81-year-old corrupt career politician who campaigned to tiny crowds from his basement in 2020, vacations frequently, and suffers mental lapses. The man running the Trump prosecutions and everything else in this regime is the same man who weaponized the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency against Americans, their representatives and candidate Trump; the man who led Trump-targeting meetings in the Oval Office just before handing over the presidency. The man running it all still lives just an 11-minute drive away, amid dozens of embassies, missions and ambassadors’ residences, with high-level leftist elites coming and going from his mansion. He is operating an ongoing coup against the people of the United States of America and their duly elected representatives.
His name is Barack Obama.
If slowing down and slandering Donald Trump with politically motivated lawsuits still doesn’t stop him and his millions of supporters, then Obama and his apparatus will work to make him legally ineligible for their votes.
The Colorado Supreme Court fired the first major shot in this political prosecution. The Colorado justices ruled in December 2023 that the Capitol trespassing and rioting on Jan. 6, 2021, was an insurrection and that President Trump is guilty of inciting it, thus barring him from federal office under the 14th Amendment. Days later, and with the same reasoning, Maine’s secretary of state unilaterally removed Trump from that state’s presidential primary ballot.
Democrats in the media, politics, prosecutors’ offices and court rooms have characterized President Trump as a “threat to democracy” who must be kept from office—not by the will of the people but by the will of certain prosecutors and judges. As incredible as it sounds, voters in the United States of America are potentially in the process of being presented a list of pre-approved presidential candidates by elites in Washington, D.C. If they succeed, Obama’s long-promised “fundamental transformation” of America will be complete. The world’s greatest constitutional republic will have become an authoritarian dictatorship.
Treasonous Plot
The most serious of these charges is special prosecutor Jack Smith’s third indictment. On Aug. 1, 2023, Smith convinced a grand jury in Washington, D.C., to indict Trump on a charge of attempting to delay the certification of the 2020 presidential election by inciting violence at the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protests.
There is no evidence that Trump did this—because he didn’t. After failing to win a hearing in the Supreme Court or any other court, President Trump wanted and needed those protesters to walk to the Capitol to “cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women” and “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” because his last chance at stopping the usurpation of the presidency was with members of Congress meeting, introducing evidence, and debating. The suspicious actions before the violence, the ways in which the violence started, the general orderliness of most protesters, the authorities’ refusal to release video evidence, and the fact that this all prevented Congress from debating election fraud with millions watching shows that the aspect of Jan. 6, 2021, that involved violence only benefited the radical Democrats.
But Smith is not focused on the facts of January 6 so much as on the prospect of “lawfully” barring President Trump from office under the 14th Amendment. He just needs a few people in the right places to agree that Trump was involved in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States or gave “aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” Then millions of American voters will have no choice.
To radicals like Smith, that eventuality is mesmerizing. Smith’s charges are timed to hamper and even end his presidential campaign. President Trump claims not only innocence but “immunity” from prosecution for actions taken while he was serving in the White House. These claims are not deterring Smith. His mission isn’t upholding the law but rather helping Attorney General Merrick Garland; Garland’s boss, Joe Biden; and Biden’s boss, Barack Obama, to keep Trump off the ballot.
In December, the court agreed to a quick review of Trump’s presidential immunity claim so Smith could continue his prosecution, using the failed immunity claim to bolster his momentum. But some radical Democrats are worried that getting the Supreme Court involved in this case may ultimately benefit Trump if conservative justices take his side.
Supreme Court
On Dec. 13, 2023, the court agreed to hear a case brought by Joseph Fischer, a January 6 protester who says he was only briefly inside the Capitol but was still charged with obstructing a congressional proceeding. Fischer argued that the statute he supposedly violated was enacted in the wake of the Enron collapse and was intended to apply to evidence tampering that obstructs an official proceeding. Smith cites this statute in two of his four felony charges against President Trump.
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols initially dismissed the case against Fischer, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the lower court ruling. So Fischer appealed to the Supreme Court.
Smith wants the Supreme Court to skip the normal appellate process and rule promptly so his January 6 insurrection trial can begin before the Republican Party Super Tuesday primaries begin (another indication he is more concerned about prosecuting Biden’s chief rival than in administering actual justice). Yet an adverse ruling in the Fischer case could limit the charges Smith can bring against Trump. Democrats are already going so far as to demand that Justice Clarence Thomas recuse himself from this case because they fear he may apply the Constitution.
The Supreme Court decision to take up the case delayed Smith’s ability to proceed on all four counts in the indictment. If the court rules that Trump has prosecutorial immunity or that the January 6 protesters who trespassed on Capitol grounds cannot be charged with preventing “the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding” like Enron auditors did in 2002, President Trump will be free of at least this attempt to keep voters from having his name on the ballot. But Fischer v. the United States could become the beginning of a much bigger investigation into Jan. 6, 2021, and the electoral irregularities of Nov. 3, 2020.
Since before the 2020 presidential election, my father, Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry, has asserted that the Bible prophesies Donald Trump’s role, that certain prophecies about him remain unfulfilled, that the presidency is rightfully his, and that he will be president. The imposition of Joe Biden surprised all of us, yet throughout this tumultuous period and all the ups and downs, my father has been certain that Donald Trump is the rightful president and will regain that power. And he has specified that the “kingdom’s court” will likely facilitate this. So you must understand the “kingdom’s court” to understand the political war against Trump.
‘The Kingdom’s Court’
“I don’t know, but I would think the Supreme Court is going to have to rule on this election eventually,” my father wrote on Nov. 9, 2020. “The fact that Justice [Amy Coney] Barrett will be there when that happens increases the odds that the law will be upheld! And that would make all the difference for the president. … I would think that is the way God is going to solve this, but He may have other ideas.”
My father based his analysis on a scripture in Amos 7:13, where an evil priest tells the Prophet Amos, “But prophesy not again any more at Bethel: for it is the king’s chapel, and it is the king’s court.”
He explains in his article “Is America’s Supreme Court in Bible Prophecy?” that the phrase “king’s chapel” indicates a religious movement that is more personally loyal to the king than to the man God is using to warn the nation. Although President Trump is not especially religious, American Christian evangelicals see him as their only hope for slowing or stopping the horrendous evils afflicting America. So they strongly support him.
“King’s court” is better translated “kingdom’s court” and refers to a “nonreligious entity” that supports the king. My father uses this and other prophecies, including 2 Kings 14:26-28, to show that this leader—who is in power during the final days of the superpower descended from ancient Israel—is Donald Trump. The kingdom’s court that supports him is the Supreme Court of the United States.
Congress closed debate and certified the 2020 election for Joe Biden at 3:44 a.m. on Jan. 7, 2021. There is no established constitutional process for undoing a congressional election certification even if a usurpation is uncovered. So the Supreme Court would have to rule on what to do in such a circumstance. The Trumpet still expects the theft of the 2020 election to be fully exposed, for Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s power to dwindle, and for Donald Trump to return to the presidency. So keep watching the Supreme Court.
The court initially lacked courage in the face of the election steal, government tyranny and other issues, but its role is by no means insignificant. Many of the justices must realize that America will no longer be a democratic republic at all if prosecutors like Smith can ban a man from even running for office because a few of his supporters trespassed on Capitol grounds they didn’t know were closed to the public. The Supreme Court could be involved in determining whether America survives as a republic—or whether it survives at all.
Amos describes this as the period when God “will not again pass by them anymore.” As my father has said, God will indeed give this nation one last chance to repent of the horrible sins that have led us to such a horrible place in our history. And He is going to do it specifically through President Donald Trump.